Reconnaître et aborder les biais inconscients dans le processus de recrutement

Références

Ahlqvist, V et al (2014) A Gender-Neutral Process? A Qualitative Study of the Evaluation of Research Grant Applications. Stockholm: Swedish Research Council

Brommesson, D., Erlingsson, G.Ó., Ödalen, J. et al. “Teach more, but do not expect any applause”: Are Women Doubly Discriminated Against in Universities’ Recruitment Processes?. J Acad Ethics (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-021-09421-5

Campbell, L.G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M.E., Rinehart, J. (2013). Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PloS One, 8(10), e79147.

ECU – Equality Challenge Unit. (2014). Unconscious bias in higher education http://www.ecu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/unconscious-bias-and-higher-education.pdf

Erlandsson, A. (2019) “Do Men Favor Men in Recruitment? A Field Experiment in the Swedish Labor Market”, Work and Occupations

Ernst, E. et al. (1992) Reviewer Bias. Ann Intern Med, 116.

Exley C.L. Kessler J.B (2019) The Gender Gap in Self-Promotion, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 26345, http://www.nber.org/papers/w26345, DOI: 10.3386/w26345

Gibney, E. (2016) Women under-represented in world’s science academies. Nature News [Online] Gloor, J.L. et al. (2016) Fix the Game – Not the Dame: A Team Intervention for Gender Equality in Leadership [Online].

Gloor, Jamie; Okimoto, Tyler G. King, Eden B. (2021) “Maybe Baby?” – The Employment Risk of Potential Parenthood. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Early View online ISSN 0021-9029

Kaatz, A., Guerrez, B. Carnes, M. (2014). Threats to objectivity in peer review: the case of gender. Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, 35 (8), 371-373.

LERU – League of European Research Universities (2018) Implicit bias in academia: A challenge to the meritocratic principle and to women’s careers – And what to do about it, https://www.leru.org/publications/implicit-bias-in-academia-a-challenge-to-the-meritocratic-principle-and-to-womens-careers-and-what-to-do-about-it

LERU – League of European Research Universities (2022) A Pathway towards Multidimensional Academic Careers: A LERU Framework for the Assessment of Researchers, https://www.leru.org/publications/a-pathway-towards-multidimensional-academic-careers-a-leru-framework-for-the-assessment-of-researchers

MacNell, L., Driscoll A. Hunt A.N. (2015) What’s in a Name: Exposing gender bias in student ratings of teaching. Innov High Educ, 40.

Milkman, K.L. et al. (2014) What Happens Before? A Field Experiment Exploring How Pay and Representation Differentially Shape Bias on the Pathway into Organizations. J Appl Psychol, 100.

Nittrouer C.L. et al. (2017) Gender disparities in colloquium speakers at top universities. PNAS, 115.

Pern Kandola (2014) Workshop on gender bias at MNF. 8 September 2014.

Sheltzer, J.M. Smith J.C. (2014) Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. PNAS, 111.

Steinpreis, R.E., Anders, K.A. Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles, 41(7/8), 509-529

Stöcklin, S. (2016) Subtile Diskriminierungen verhindern. UZH J, 6.

Trix Psenka (2003) “Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty”. Discourse Society. Vol 3.2, pg. 191-220.

Van den Brink, M. Benschop Y. (2011) Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19.

Van den Besselaar, P. Sandström, U. (2016). Gender differences in research performance and its impact on careers, Scientometrics, 106, 143-162

Van der Lee, R. Ellemers N. (2015) Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands. PNAS, 112

Wennerås, C., Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387, 341–343.

West, JD et al (2013) The Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship. PLoS ONE, 8